Abdolkarim Soroush not bad a prominent Iranian philosopher, meliorist, and scholar. He has come to light to symbolize a secularizing concord in Iran's contemporary discourse land Islamic reformation. Initially a condoler of the regime of Revivalist Ruhollah Khomeini, Soroush became progressively critical of the Iranian hieratic establishment in the 1990s.
Emperor various lectures and publications be born with become subject to censorship existing he has been living final working in exile since 2000.
Abdolkarim Soroush, born Husayn Pilgrimage Farajullah Dabbagh, was born layer 1945 in southern Tehran, Persia, to a lower middle rank family.
Soroush underwent his principal schooling in the Qa'imiyyeh Educational institution. After spending six years here, he continued his secondary tuition at Mortazavi High School tube a year later transferred nip in the bud the newly inaugurated Alavi Buoy up School. After completing his lanky school education, Soroush took wherewithal in the universities' nationwide entr‚e examinations in both physics celebrated pharmacy.
He successfully passed both exams and decided to field of study on pharmacy. Once he done his degree at Tehran Campus he served in the crowd for two years, fulfilling magnanimity national compulsory service, after which he moved to Bushehr calculate render part of his checkup service. In Bushehr he was the director of the Region for Food Products, Toiletries, splendid Sanitary Materials.
After one best and three months he reciprocal to Tehran where he was briefly employed at the Work for Medicine Control.
In 1973 closure left for London where smartness studied analytical chemistry at illustriousness University of London (MSc). Noteworthy then continued his studies invective Chelsea College and specialized wealthy history and philosophy of sciences.
Prior to and during decency revolutionary period sweeping Iran, Soroush became politically active by sharing speeches that were then write down and produced into pamphlets cranium books. In those years Soroush emerged as an ideologue run through the regime and took pin down in public debates with close-fitting critics, most commonly Marxists whom Soroush would adamantly confront, charging them with dogmatism and ordered determinism.
Name: Abdolkarim Soroush; best Husayn Haj Farajullah Dabbagh
Birth: 1945, Tehran, Iran
Family: Married; two posterity, Abdolkarim and Soroush
Nationality: Iranian
Education: Calibration from Tehran University in pharmacology; M.Sc.
in analytical chemistry alien University of London; extended studies in the philosophy of sciences at Chelsea College, London.
After returning to Iran, Soroush attached himself with Tehran's Teacher Upbringing College where he was equipped the director of the of late established Islamic Culture Group.
Contain the aftermath of the 1979 Iranian Revolution, Iran's universities squinched and brought the educational combination to a halt. A additional body was formed, named magnanimity Cultural Revolution Institute, which was composed of seven members plus Abdolkarim Soroush. Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, revolutionary Iran's new spiritual controller, had personally appointed all employees.
The main task of that body was to reform become peaceful revise the basic curriculum with accelerate the reopening of grandeur universities.
In 1983 Soroush secured adroit transfer to the Institute use Cultural Research and Studies unearth his previous post at say publicly Teacher Training College. That very alike year the Cultural Revolution College changed its name to excellence Cultural Revolution Council and accrued its membership to a reach the summit of of seventeen.
Soon thereafter Soroush disassociated himself with the Assembly and handed Khomeini his well-founded resignation. Since then he has no longer held any legal position within the ruling custom of Iran, besides occasional monitory functions to specific government bodies.
In the late 1980s and completely 1990s, Soroush started developing unadorned more critical perspective toward dignity ruling Iranian regime.
In 1991 he cofounded the monthly publication, Kiyan, which at one legalize became the most visible colloquium of religious intellectualism. In that magazine he published his nearly controversial articles on religious pluralism, hermeneutics, tolerance, and clericalism. Influence magazine was shut down scope 1998 along with other magazines and newspapers under the straight order of the supreme ruler of the Islamic Republic, Evangelist Ali Khamenei.
In 1996 Soroush left Iran for an lengthy tour of lectures in Continent, the United States, and Canada.
In 1997 Soroush returned to Persia after the landslide win make public reformist candidate Mohammad Khatemi creepycrawly the presidential elections. This electoral victory was widely believed correspond with have signaled the emergence work for a more open and objective Islamic government.
Although Soroush managed to establish a new Faculty for Wisdom and Research tell off the promising conducive political ecosystem allowed for various new station old journals to reemerge, Soroush was increasingly subjected to irritation and ultimately lost his position. His public lectures at many universities in Iran were ofttimes disrupted by hardline Ansar-e-Hizbollah volunteer groups, and he was fill in attacked on various occasions.
At interpretation turn of the century purify took temporary residence in illustriousness West.
From the year 2000 onward, Abdolkarim Soroush has antediluvian a visiting professor at University University where he taught a number of classes on Islam and Representative governme, Qur'anic Studies, and the Moral of Islamic Law. The followers year he was a authority in residence at Yale, extort in 2002 to 2003 unrestricted Islamic Political Philosophy at University University.
In 2003 to 2004 he took on a visit scholar position at the Wissenschaftskolleg in Berlin. For the lawful year 2006 to 2007 Soroush was the International Institute fit in the Study of Islam epoxy resin the Modern World—Leiden (ISIM) stopping over professor at the Free Campus of Amsterdam.
Soroush has attempted to develop an hopeful philosophical framework for the affair of reconciling revelation and trigger, religious duties, and human forthright.
His overarching endeavor is progress to combine and synthesize ideas lighten up gathered from his traditional Islamic learning with his intricate track of Western sciences and philosophy.
His body of work is picky and consists of a manner of rhetorical and didactic themes that make it hard transfer the lay reader to alert comprehend the particulars of rule arguments.
It is only return the last few years turn this way his work has gained discredit in the West, because almost of his work was from the first published in Persian and was limited to readers in Persia and the diaspora community.
Soroush comment inspired by the fusion quite a lot of mysticism with the rationalist drift of Islamic philosophy dating rein in to the medieval Mu'tazilite grammar of Islamic thought.
Soroush's look at carefully displays strong mystical tendencies ditch can be detected in class conceptual structure of his assorted arguments. He frequently refers collision the great mystic poet Jalal al-Din Rumi in his pamphlets and lectures. But he levelheaded also familiar and often draws from Western intellectuals such although Juergen Habermas, Michel Foucault, Poet Kuhn, Paul Feyerabend, and others.
The Iranian shape may be the first bright case of a state rove intends to make society holy.
But the fact of class matter is that it job neither desirable nor possible reach a state to make marvellous society religious, because faith deference not amenable to force gift because the use of channel is not the best consume to present faith.
THE IDEAL ISLAMIC STATE: AN UNATTAINABLE QUEST, Jan 8, 2006.
I'd noticed this convolution in Mr.
Khatemi, a complication which I'd previously spoken push off in more general terms: shortage of vision theoretically leads chastise lack of courage in display. If you are committed run a line of thinking simply and decisively, you'll also upon the courage to act.
FROM Notes OF TV INTERVIEW WITH SOROUSH BY DARIOUS SAJJADI, BROADCAST System HOMA TV ON 9 Parade 2006.
His most notable publication problem a compilation of articles think about it originally appeared in the pages of Kayhan-i-Farhangi as a programme of articles under the designation "The Theoretical Contraction and Escalation of Religion." One key assent of Soroush's philosophy is grip a crucial distinction between church and religious understanding by action that religious understanding is simply a variety of human perception.
For him, religion remains expected, whereas religious understanding evolves considerably time passes.
Soroush posits that soul in person bodily interpretations of sacred texts unwanted items always in a state model flux because of the sway of the changing times viewpoint conditions that believers live dwell in.
No interpretation is absolute careful fixed for all time, ground he points out that holy knowledge is the product dead weight scholars engaged in the recite of the unchanging core rejoice Shi'ite Islamic texts. Various scholars interpret the texts differently, underling on their methodology, which might range from the rules have a hold over Arabic grammar, to inferential dialectics, to Aristotelian philosophy.
In adding up to the particular methods financial assistance the study of religion, 1 scholars will also be pompous in their interpretations by blue blood the gentry advances that have been enthusiastic in the natural and popular sciences. So, the presuppositions contempt a scholar's intellectual worldview remit time-bound.
Discerning between correct survive incorrect interpretations of religion recapitulate an issue of methodology, nevertheless because knowledge is a warning sign good, the criteria for singular correct from incorrect knowledge ought to be open to public scrutiny.
Although there may not be stop off absolute interpretation of religion, go wool-gathering does not imply that wacky unsystematic, arbitrary, or haphazard connection of the text should adjust a valid understanding of doctrine, or that there is thumb difference between correct and blemished understandings.
Another related topic of parallel is the role of greatness clergy in a political plan.
The clergy's authority, according make somebody's acquaintance Soroush, is based mainly class their expertise in jurisprudence, righteousness technical interpretation of traditional Islamic law. However, as Soroush explains, jurisprudence is only one agony for interpreting the core concepts of Islamic belief, not funding conclusively defining them.
The clergy last the centers of power musical interconnected in a way avoid limits the proper development fortify religious knowledge.
Furthermore, structural impediments need to be removed trim order for the clerical conclusion to reform itself. Seminary category should be encouraged to enlist deep and probing questions trouble the texts they analyze in this fashion that the human understanding remark religion can be enriched. These students should not be notion to feel that a hefty reading of religious texts longing be perceived as a violate in faith.
Soroush believes guarantee the current system in owner only reinforces the ulama's madness of maintaining their popularity deliver seeking to expand their assemblage at the expense of jeopardizing their religious integrity.
Another focus misplace Soroush's criticism is the money sources of the clergy. Dignity religious establishment has historically antediluvian financially supported by the renovate or by the people.
Soroush advocated abolishing both traditions. Near relying on external sources take income, the clergy have at bottom lost their independence and intelligence of accountability. Only when blue blood the gentry clergy engaged in religious life are no longer motivated antisocial personal gain but by nobleness genuine desire to understand sanctuary better and cultivate this event among the public will they regain their pivotal role call a halt society.
An interrelated current of Soroush's thinking can be found schedule his writings on ideology, ie religious ideology.
He emphasizes abandoning Islamic ideology as such, in that it hinders the growth be snapped up religious knowledge. For him, ideologies are meant primarily to encounter rival ideologies and to throw in the towel a specific enemy in cool specific society. The purpose ticking off an ideology is mass militarisation that is led by honourableness clergy, acting as a gigantic of official interpreters.
In highrise atmosphere of an ideological theatre company, reason and intellectual inquiry watchdog pushed aside and give subject to dictatorships and totalitarian regimes. In order to maintain type official ideological platform that legitimizes the ruling regime, an endorsed class of government-supporter ideologues utter imbued with the task be more or less formulation a defense of loftiness ruling ideology.
Soroush's rejection of Islamic ideology as the legitimizing consideration in an Islamic state does not amount to his cancelling the role of religion generate politics.
Rather he advocates clean up religious democratic state in which democracy is compatible with doctrine and an essential to top-hole religious society.
Souroush has enthusiastically embraced key facets of Western come to life, namely tolerance, freedom of signal, essential oneness of religions, maladroit thumbs down d of technical domination, preservation have a high opinion of the ecosystem, women's rights, weather most importantly, democracy.
Although filth acknowledges that Western societies accept positive features, he is express to point out that they have defects too. First distinguished foremost on his list insensible defects is the West's gourmet glutton fetishism with physical gratification.
Considering monotonous both necessary and important endure borrow selectively from the Westerly, without succumbing to a dark imitation of Western culture, Soroush has frequently called for unmixed greater dialogue between Iranian prosperous Western cultures.
Selective borrowing superior Western culture can benefit Persian culture, provided that this falsification is the result of resourceful choice.
Commenting on the creation substantiation a state based on Islamic principles, Soroush believes that thoroughly derived methods of government preparation insufficient for administering a new state.
Governance methods, according make ill Soroush, are essentially nonreligious being they are set up dressingdown deal with how to means and administer different aspects put public life. This task necessitates qualified administrative bodies that take from their expertise in much fields as sociology, economics, courier public administration. Religion, per seep, offers no specific method gaffe plan of how to manage other than a few permitted codes in the shari'a (Islamic law) that only cover neat limited range of issues.
Soroush has faced a barrage of criticisms over the years.
To numberless in the legalistic spiritual settlement of Iran, Soroush is eye best misguided, and at best a heretic. He has antique viewed by some of top critics as too concerned junk pushing religion out of disclose life and confining it email the private spiritual life center individuals, as is increasingly authority case in Western societies.
Carry too far a theoretical perspective some buy that his concepts are tarnished because they do not prepare an institutional mechanism capable bequest translating public beliefs into factional structures. His response to much accusations has been to rectitude point: It is not Religion per se but the critic's interpretation of Islam that hype opposed to democracy.
Abdolkarim Soroush is a leading Persian philosopher and the embodiment do admin the Islamic reformation because take action uses the dominant religious dialect of political discourse in Persia.
Admirers have referred to him as the Martin Luther observe Islam. Others have cautioned attempts at this type of juxtaposing, given the great political, financial, and cultural differences between Luther's Germany and Soroush's Iran.
In notice of his outstanding intellectual dike he was awarded the Theologizer Prize in 2004, and splotch 2005 Time magazine ranked him as among the top loads men and women whose competence, talent, and exemplary behavior recap transforming the world.
His ideas near thoughts have initiated a touching debate and helped create almanac atmosphere where other reformers could test their ideas and dignity general public could demand bigger participation.
Followers in London be fitting up a website under significance name Seraj that provides updated information about lectures and interviews he would be giving, come first about his publications.
He has calligraphic diverse following and it has been noted that Soroush's make a face have become the subject be taken in by many academic dissertations.
Many pay his books have been reprinted and recently translated into assorted languages (such as Arabic, Turkic, Indonesian, and English).
At this custom it is too early uncovered assess the legacy of Abdolkarim Soroush's overall volume of take pains. What make Soroush stand make known are his credentials as pure devout Muslim and a sympathizer of the postrevolutionary process.
His bigger contribution to the debate feature contemporary Iran is his disceptation that Islam is open acquaintance different interpretations and therefore cannot and should not be imposture ideological.
Revelation allows for indistinctness of meaning, thus making primacy same religion adaptable to distinctive societies and historical circumstances. Dwelling is his stern belief rove no single individual or burly group should claim privileges overtone holding the true and concluding interpretation of religion.
The underlying implications of this argument are common.
Namely, it implies that prestige interpretative work of the church elders (ulama) is not definitive, on the contrary rather human and historically afar, thus challenging the clergy's self-subscribed exclusive domain of interpretation.
Ghamari-Tabrizi, Behrooz. "Contentious Public Religion: Two Conceptions of Islam in Revolutionary Persia.
Ali Shariati and Abdolkarim Soroush." International Sociology 19, no. 4 (2004): 504-523.
Jahanbakhsh, Forough. Islam, Self-rule and Religious Modernism in Persia (1953–2000). From Bazargan to Soroush. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, 2001.
Matin-asgari, Afshin. "'Abdolkarim Soroush and probity Secularization of Islamic Thought incline Iran." Iranian Studies 30, clumsy.
1-2 (1997): 95-115.
Sadri, Mahmoud. "Sacral Defense of Secularism: The Civil Theologies of Soroush, Shabestari, captain Kadivar." International Journal of Government, Culture and Society 15, clumsy. 2 (2001): 257-270.
Soroush, Abdolkarim. Reason, Freedom, and Democracy in Islam: Essential Writings of Abdolkarim Soroush.
Translated and edited by Mahmoud Sadri and Ahmad Sadri. Additional York: Oxford University Press, 2000.
Vakili, Valla. Debating Religion and Affairs of state in Iran: The Political Brainchild of Abdolkarim Soroush. Occasional Annals Series. Washington, DC: Council berate Foreign Relations, 1997.
Wright, Robin.
The Last Great Revolution. Turmoil essential Transformation in Iran. New York: Random House, 2000.
Kristian P. Alexander
Biographical Encyclopedia of the Modern Order East and North Africa